Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Zdenek Kotala" <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0
Date: 2008-07-05 09:58:39
Message-ID: 87iqvkwt2o.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:

> do I need to worry about memory leaks in citext_eq, citext_ne, citext_gt,
> etc.,

yes

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message H.Harada 2008-07-05 10:04:29 introduction of WIP window function patch
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-07-05 09:58:04 Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0