Re: [SPAM] Re: posix_fadvise v22

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: posix_fadvise v22
Date: 2009-01-03 22:47:21
Message-ID: 87iqowt3ba.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:

> On Friday 02 January 2009 06:49:57 Greg Stark wrote:
>> The guc run-time check is checking for known-buggy versions of glibc  
>> using sysconf to check what version of glibc you have.
>
> Could you please mention the bug number in the relevant source code comments?

It's Debian bug# 312406 which was fixed in Debian release 2.3.5-3. So it's
probably one of these but searching for posix_fadvise doesn't find anything in
their bug tracker:

Version 2.3.6

* The following bugs are resolved with this release:

38, 253, 549, 622, 653, 721, 758, 851, 877, 915, 934, 955, 961,
1016, 1037, 1076, 1079, 1080, 1081, 1082, 1083, 1084, 1085, 1086,
1087, 1088, 1090, 1091, 1092, 1093, 1094, 1095, 1096, 1097, 1098,
1099, 1100, 1101, 1102, 1103, 1104, 1105, 1106, 1107, 1108, 1109,
1110, 1111, 1112, 1113, 1125, 1137, 1138, 1249, 1250, 1251, 1252,
1253, 1254, 1350, 1358, 1394, 1438, 1498, 1534

Visit <http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/> for the details of each bug.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2009-01-03 22:53:51 Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-01-03 22:45:44 Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?