Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
Subject: Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
Date: 2015-04-04 14:45:44
Message-ID: 87iodct0ot.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

>> I see nothing in the win32 stuff that tries to define
>> USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL on 64-bit windows, is this just an oversight or
>> does it not actually work there? or is it for on-disk compatibility
>> with 32-bit windows?

Tom> That flag doesn't affect on-disk compatibility.

pg_type.typbyval ?

But I don't know if anything else differs between 32-bit and 64-bit
windows that would impact on compatibility.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2015-04-04 14:55:01 Re: TABLESAMPLE patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-04-04 14:27:33 Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric