From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Scaling up PostgreSQL in Multiple CPU / Dual Core |
Date: | 2006-03-24 02:22:34 |
Message-ID: | 87hd5olgyd.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com (Scott Marlowe) wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 10:43, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> > Has someone been working on the problem of splitting a query into pieces
>> > and running it on multiple CPUs / multiple machines? Yes. Bizgress has
>> > done that.
>>
>> I believe that is limited to Bizgress MPP yes?
>
> Yep. I hope that someday it will be released to the postgresql global
> dev group for inclusion. Or at least parts of it.
Question: Does the Bizgress/MPP use threading for this concurrency?
Or forking?
If it does so via forking, that's more portable, and less dependent on
specific complexities of threading implementations (which amounts to
non-portability ;-)).
Most times Jan comes to town, we spend a few minutes musing about the
"splitting queries across threads" problem, and dismiss it again; if
there's the beginning of a "split across processes," that's decidedly
neat :-).
--
output = reverse("moc.liamg" "@" "enworbbc")
http://linuxfinances.info/info/internet.html
Why do we put suits in a garment bag, and put garments in a suitcase?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Theo Kramer | 2006-03-24 04:32:29 | Re: Indexes with descending date columns |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-03-23 17:02:44 | Re: Scaling up PostgreSQL in Multiple CPU / Dual Core |