From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Netflix Prize data |
Date: | 2006-10-04 23:36:09 |
Message-ID: | 87hcyj64d2.fsf@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> writes:
> CREATE TABLE rating (
> movie SMALLINT NOT NULL,
> person INTEGER NOT NULL,
> rating SMALLINT NOT NULL,
> viewed DATE NOT NULL
> );
You would probably be better off putting the two smallints first followed by
the integer and date. Otherwise both the integer and the date field will have
an extra two bytes of padding wasting 4 bytes of space.
If you reorder the fields that way you'll be down to 28 bytes of tuple header
overhead and 12 bytes of data. There's actually another 4 bytes in the form of
the line pointer so a total of 44 bytes per record. Ie, almost 73% of the disk
i/o you're seeing is actually per-record overhead.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-10-04 23:39:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Updated version of FAQ_Solaris |
Previous Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-10-04 22:57:58 | Re: Netflix Prize data |