| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Hiroshi Saito <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows. |
| Date: | 2008-11-24 15:29:22 |
| Message-ID: | 87hc5xrvl9.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Please stick to the convention of including include files in
> alphabetical order.
I didn't realize we had such a convention. Is this for all include files or
only within a directory? Are there exceptions where the order matters or have
we managed to make sure it doesn't everywhere?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-24 15:44:40 | Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows. |
| Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2008-11-24 15:25:09 | Re: [bugfix] DISCARD ALL does not release advisory locks |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-24 15:44:40 | Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows. |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Saito | 2008-11-24 15:12:38 | Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows. |