| From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec (Jaime Casanova), pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: TODO item |
| Date: | 2009-03-28 11:57:43 |
| Message-ID: | 87hc1deu6g.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Jaime" == Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
Jaime> In the TODO list there is an item "[D] Completed itemAdd
Jaime> array_agg() and UNNEST functions for arrays " marked as done
Jaime> but 5 items below there is: "Add SQL-standard array_agg() and
Jaime> unnest() array functions " it's the same item so this one
Jaime> should be removed... or there is a difference between the
Jaime> array_agg() and unnest() implemented versus SQL-standard
Jaime> array_agg() and unnest()?
The array_agg() does, I believe, match the standard one, at least
my reading of the spec doesn't reveal any obvious issues there.
The unnest() implementation is largely unrelated to the standard one,
which is impossible to provide without LATERAL.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2009-03-28 13:23:59 | Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2009-03-28 11:48:34 | Re: Crash in gist insertion on pathological box data |