| From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Toast issues with OldestXmin going backwards |
| Date: | 2018-04-27 15:35:31 |
| Message-ID: | 87h8nwacri.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
Robert> One idea that occurred to me is to somehow record -- I guess in
Robert> pg_class using non-transactional updates -- the last cutoff XID
Robert> used to vacuum any given table. Then we could just make a rule
Robert> that you can't vacuum the TOAST table with an XID that's newer
Robert> than the last one used for the main table. That would preserve
Robert> the property that you can vacuum the tables separately while
Robert> avoiding dangling pointers. But that's obviously not
Robert> back-patchable,
The suggestion made previously (in a historical thread) was to use an
entry in the reloptions field for this, at least in back branches. It
would be necessary for vacuum to add the entry initially in a normal
transactional update, after which it could be updated inplace.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-04-27 15:36:40 | Re: documentation is now XML |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2018-04-27 15:33:31 | Re: Built-in connection pooling |