Re: psql and readline comments

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Дилян Палаузов <dpa-postgres(at)aegee(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql and readline comments
Date: 2019-01-31 15:04:54
Message-ID: 87h8doan0t.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

>>>>> "Дилян" == Дилян Палаузов <dpa-postgres(at)aegee(dot)org> writes:

Дилян> Hello,
Дилян> my reading on the correspondence so far is, that:

You missed the most important point, which is that if anyone wants to
seriously propose this, they need to _actually test it_ with building
against some common libedit versions to verify that it doesn't break
anything.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Bug reporting form 2019-01-31 16:19:01 BUG #15615: pg_upgrade and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2019-01-31 14:44:10 Re: psql and readline comments