Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/plpgsql.sgml oc/src/ ...

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian - CVS" <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/plpgsql.sgml oc/src/ ...
Date: 2002-11-23 22:25:15
Message-ID: 87fztr53g4.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> BTW, does making the default 'STATEMENT' if they do not specify a
> 'FOR EACH' clause break previous behaviour?

No, it doesn't -- the previous behavior didn't allow a default
(i.e. either FOR EACH ROW or FOR EACH STATEMENT had to be specified,
with STATEMENT producing an error).

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian - CVS 2002-11-24 03:14:01 pgsql-server/doc TODO
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-11-23 21:47:40 Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/plpgsql.sgml oc/src/ ...