From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |
Date: | 2006-10-13 03:15:58 |
Message-ID: | 87fydsaosx.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
After a long battle with technology, jim(at)nasby(dot)net ("Jim C. Nasby"), an earthling, wrote:
> But you can actually write good code that will run on multiple
> databases if you're willing to write the tools to allow you to do it.
There's an argument out there that we don't actually have relational
databases (the "fine point" there being that it is technically
permissible to create tables that lack a primary key), but rather
"toolboxes" that might be used to construct relational systems.
That kind of fits with that sort of toolkit approach...
--
"cbbrowne","@","gmail.com"
http://cbbrowne.com/info/nonrdbms.html
"I'm sorry, Mr. Kipling, but you just don't know how to use the
English Language." -- Editor of the San Francisco Examiner, informing
Rudyard Kipling, who had one article published in the newspaper, that
he needn't bother submitting a second, 1889
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan Vanasco | 2006-10-13 04:20:31 | Re: bad error message |
Previous Message | Niederland | 2006-10-13 01:40:22 | Create Index on Date portion of timestamp |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ivan Zolotukhin | 2006-10-13 05:37:20 | Re: Fwd: pg_dump VS alter database ... set search_path ... |
Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2006-10-13 03:12:29 | Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal |