Re: savepoint improvements

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: savepoint improvements
Date: 2007-01-22 16:11:43
Message-ID: 87fya3f3cw.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:

> BEGIN;
> stmt1;
> stmt2; <-- error
> stmt3;
> COMMIT;
>
> results in stmt3 completing successfully even though stmt1 and stmt2 do
> not == broken script.

stmt1 would still be completed successfully.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-01-22 16:19:18 Re: pg_dump ANALYZE statements
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-01-22 15:56:20 Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements