Re: why cannot UNION both SELECT and SHOW?

From: Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>
To: Konstantin Izmailov <pgfizm(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why cannot UNION both SELECT and SHOW?
Date: 2011-08-01 21:18:44
Message-ID: 87fwlkg79n.fsf@comcast.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Konstantin Izmailov <pgfizm(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

> Is it possible instead of executing following two statements:
> ? SHOW search_path; SELECT version();
> to execute just one statement returning both search_path and version?
>
> I'm using Postgres 9.0 and need the result either as two tuples or two fields...
>
> Could you suggest how to rewrite the two statements?

foo=# select current_setting('search_path'), version();
current_setting | version
-----------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"$user",public | PostgreSQL 9.0.3 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.4.4-14ubuntu5) 4.4.5, 64-bit
(1 row)

>
> Thx
>

--
Jerry Sievers
Postgres DBA/Development Consulting
e: postgres(dot)consulting(at)comcast(dot)net
p: 305.321.1144

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-08-01 22:58:48 Re: Pending trigger events on ALTER TABLE in 8.3
Previous Message Reuven M. Lerner 2011-08-01 21:12:58 Re: Pending trigger events on ALTER TABLE in 8.3