Re: SP-GiST support for inet datatypes

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SP-GiST support for inet datatypes
Date: 2016-08-21 21:37:36
Message-ID: 87fupxhkti.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com> writes:
>> Attached patches add SP-GiST support to the inet datatypes.

Tom> I started to look at this patch. The reported speedup is pretty
Tom> nice, but ...

The builtin gist support for inet seems quite surprisingly slow; ip4r
beats it into the ground without difficulty. (I'd be curious how well
this sp-gist version stacks up against ip4r.)

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2016-08-21 22:08:52 Re: synchronous_commit = remote_flush
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-08-21 16:39:14 Re: SP-GiST support for inet datatypes