From: | Nic Ferrier <nferrier(at)tapsellferrier(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Lars Stenberg" <lars(dot)stenberg(at)psycat(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Coding style |
Date: | 2003-02-02 21:23:35 |
Message-ID: | 87el6q5qco.fsf@pooh-sticks-bridge.tapsellferrier.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
"Lars Stenberg" <lars(dot)stenberg(at)psycat(dot)net> writes:
> Hi!
>
> I wonder if the project-owner want me to watch the entire jdbc source tree
> and convert into a commonly used coding style. In A file i found at least
> three different styles:
>
> 1) public java.sql.Time getTime(int parameterIndex) throws SQLException
> {
>
> 2) public java.sql.Timestamp getTimestamp(int parameterIndex)
> throws SQLException {
>
> 3) public void setUseServerPrepare(boolean flag) throws SQLException {
>
> Might be better if we all use a common codestyle like the third one? Anyhow,
> if you want me to fix the code so it is consistent just tell me.
I'm not one of the project owners... but I do hack on postgresql and I
would rather you didn't do that.
The reason is that doing a text mangle will cause revision tracking
lossage, it's conveiniant sometimes to be able to scan backwards and
forwards across the revision tree.
I believe that postgresql jdbc code IS consistently indented, I for
one don't really care what brace style is used.
Nic
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anil Amarakoon | 2003-02-03 00:39:00 | pg_class et el -little OT |
Previous Message | Lars Stenberg | 2003-02-02 20:09:19 | Encoding problems |