Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH
Date: 2005-07-21 19:54:28
Message-ID: 87ek9sc4uj.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> > > BTW, if you actually wanted to improve readability, defining a
> > > SECS_PER_YEAR value and replacing the various occurrences of
> > > "36525 * 864" with it would help.
> > >
> > IIRC the number of seconds in a year is far from a constant.
>
> Yes, I added a comment mentioning that we don't track leap seconds.
> And this doesn't handle crossing uneven daylight savings time intervals.

It doesn't even represent leap years, never mind leap seconds.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-07-21 19:54:59 Re: Roles - SET ROLE Updated
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2005-07-21 19:53:52 Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated