Re: Replace FunctionCall2Coll with FunctionCallInvoke

From: Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replace FunctionCall2Coll with FunctionCallInvoke
Date: 2024-04-08 05:36:20
Message-ID: 87edbgmmz8.fsf@163.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Michael,

> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 12:25:00PM +0800, Andy Fan wrote:
>> During the review of using extended statistics to improve join estimates
>> [1], I found some code level optimization opportunities which apply to
>> existing code as well. To make the discussion easier, open this new
>> thread.
>
> Is that measurable?

I didn't spent time on testing it. Compared with if the improvement is
measureable, I'm more interested with if it is better than before or
not. As for measurable respect, I'm with the idea at [1]. Do you think
the measurable matter?

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZJ0a_Dcn%2BST4YSeSrLnnmajmcsi7ZvEpgkKNiF0SwBuw%40mail.gmail.com

--
Best Regards
Andy Fan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Koval 2024-04-08 06:16:54 Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-04-08 05:26:30 Re: Replace FunctionCall2Coll with FunctionCallInvoke