| From: | Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New function normal_rand_array function to contrib/tablefunc. |
| Date: | 2024-08-29 04:38:57 |
| Message-ID: | 87ed68gcym.fsf@163.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 at 12:27, Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com> wrote:
>> Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
>>
> Nitpick, the minlen is smaller than maxlen, so the maxlen cannot be zero.
>
> After giving it some more thought, it would also be helpful if maxlen is
> equal to minlen.
>
> For example, I want have each row has four items, I can use the following
>
> SELECT rand_array(10, 4, 4, 50::int, 80::int);
Yes, that's a valid usage. the new vesion is attached. I have changed
the the commit entry [1] from "Waiting on Author" to "Needs review".
> OTOH, I find the range bound uses "less than or equal to", how about
> replacing "smaller" with "less"?
--
Best Regards
Andy Fan
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v20240829-0001-Add-functions-rand_array-function-to-contr.patch | text/x-diff | 12.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shveta malik | 2024-08-29 04:49:50 | Re: Conflict Detection and Resolution |
| Previous Message | Andy Fan | 2024-08-29 04:30:44 | Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for GIN indexes |