Re: Bug in new buffer freelist code

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug in new buffer freelist code
Date: 2004-01-07 18:38:26
Message-ID: 87d69vppst.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> It might also be worthwhile to add another BM_FLAG bit that
> specifically indicates a buffer is on the freelist, and
> set/clear/test that at appropriate spots.

ISTM that BM_FREE should indicate this, or am I misunderstanding you?

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-01-07 18:47:54 Re: Bug in new buffer freelist code
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2004-01-07 18:28:17 Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf