| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ashish Karalkar" <ashish_postgre(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in> |
| Cc: | "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, "pggeneral" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <ashish(dot)karalkar(at)netcore(dot)co(dot)in> |
| Subject: | Re: Planner ignoring to use INDEX SCAN |
| Date: | 2007-12-14 13:30:36 |
| Message-ID: | 87d4t94d4z.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Ashish Karalkar" <ashish_postgre(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in> writes:
> Thanks Richard for your replay,
>
> Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> wrote:
>>
> Actually, this is the output from EXPLAIN not EXPLAIN ANALYSE. It
> doesn't show what actually happened, just what the planner thought was
> going to happen.
>
> Its from EXPLAIN ANALYSE
No, it's not. Not unless you've removed all the added info explain analyse
adds to the explain output.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2007-12-14 13:37:35 | Re: rewrite pl/pgsql functions to c - remote job |
| Previous Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2007-12-14 13:24:26 | Re: [GENERAL] Slow PITR restore |