From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>, General Postgres Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: C function question |
Date: | 2009-02-04 13:14:42 |
Message-ID: | 87d4dymji5.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
>> Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
>>> looks like it really has to be defined with "char" in double quotes. I
>>> thought just char is enough...
>
>> They're different types.
>
> You know, maybe we should stop holding our noses and do something about
> this old gotcha. That type's not going away anytime soon, but could we
> rename it to char1 or something like that?
int1?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2009-02-04 13:15:54 | Re: Crash of Postgresql on Windows |
Previous Message | Tommy Gildseth | 2009-02-04 13:14:29 | Re: Crash of Postgresql on Windows |