Re: reserved role names

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reserved role names
Date: 2016-07-05 18:12:10
Message-ID: 87d1msarb9.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Joshua" == Joshua D Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:

Joshua> Is it intentional that insert and delete are allowed and select
Joshua> is not or is it an oversight?

Just an artifact of SELECT being fully reserved (needed for (SELECT ...)
syntax to work right) while INSERT and DELETE are unreserved.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-07-05 19:00:52 Re: Parallel query and temp_file_limit
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-07-05 18:06:38 reserved role names