Re: serverless postgresql

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: "Rick Gigger" <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com>
Cc: "Jeff Bowden" <jlb(at)houseofdistraction(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: serverless postgresql
Date: 2004-01-14 18:12:09
Message-ID: 87brp64cxy.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Rick Gigger" <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com> writes:

> Anyway since postgres uses WAL files to verify the integrity of the database
> couldn't it more or less make the same guarantee's in an embedded version?
> As long as the app uses the db libs unmodified and doesn't mess with the
> files it creates how does simply making it embedded increase the change of
> db errors resulting in database corruption?

If an app's internal data structures get corrupted and it goes nuts,
pretty much anything can happen to its address space.

-Doug

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matt Davies 2004-01-14 18:18:05 Re: Postgress and MYSQL
Previous Message Rick Gigger 2004-01-14 18:03:01 Re: serverless postgresql