Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Date: 2007-06-21 10:37:21
Message-ID: 87bqf91tlq.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:

> My 2c on this:
>
> The way I was taught in school is that "min" is for minute and "mon" is for
> month. Specifically, not "m".

Sure, but nobody's saying you shouldn't be able to use "min". If you think
using "m" is wrong then by all means institute a policy at your site of using
"min" always. But the question is if someone else wants to use "m" at their
site what problems does that cause you?

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2007-06-21 10:52:44 Re: Updated tsearch documentation
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2007-06-21 10:11:12 Re: Updated tsearch documentation