From: | David Rysdam <drysdam(at)ll(dot)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | help interpreting "explain analyze" output |
Date: | 2013-11-26 17:24:08 |
Message-ID: | 87bo1784av.fsf@loud.llan.ll.mit.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I'm not really looking for information on how to speed this query
up. I'm just trying to interpret the output enough to tell me which step
is slow:
Seq Scan on mags (cost=0.00..187700750.56 rows=47476 width=4) (actual time=3004851.889..3004851.889 rows=0 loops=1)
Filter: ((signum IS NOT NULL) AND (NOT (SubPlan 1)))
SubPlan 1
-> Materialize (cost=0.00..3713.93 rows=95862 width=4) (actual time=0.011..16.145 rows=48139 loops=94951)
-> Seq Scan on sigs (cost=0.00..2906.62 rows=95862 width=4) (actual time=0.010..674.201 rows=95862 loops=1)
Total runtime: 3004852.005 ms
It looks like the inner seq scan takes 674ms, then the materialize takes
an additional 16ms? Or is that 16ms * 94951? Or 674 * 94951?
And the outer seq scan takes 3004851-3004851 = 0ms?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joey Quinn | 2013-11-26 17:24:26 | Re: tracking scripts... |
Previous Message | Vick Khera | 2013-11-26 17:13:39 | Re: tracking scripts... |