| From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: WITHIN GROUP patch |
| Date: | 2013-12-07 23:41:08 |
| Message-ID: | 87bo0sclko.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Hmm... yes, you're probably right; but we'd still have to check
>> somewhere for improper nesting, no? since not even the direct args
>> are allowed to contain nested aggregate calls.
Tom> Yeah, I had come to that same conclusion while making the
Tom> changes; actually, check_agg_arguments needs to look for aggs
Tom> but not vars there.
There's also the question of ungrouped vars, maybe. Consider these two
queries:
select array(select a+sum(x) from (values (0.3),(0.7)) v(a) group by a)
from generate_series(1,5) g(x);
select array(select percentile_disc(a) within group (order by x)
from (values (0.3),(0.7)) v(a) group by a)
from generate_series(1,5) g(x);
In both cases the aggregation query is the outer one; but while the first
can return a value, I think the second one has to fail (at least I can't
see any reasonable way of executing it).
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-12-07 23:50:46 | Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2013-12-07 23:27:31 | Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good |