Re: BugTracker

Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when chris(dot)kingslynne(at)gmail(dot)com ("Christopher Kings-Lynne") wrote:
>> We have three candidates already -- debbugs, RT and Gnats. The
>> first has the advantage that was written by hackers, for hackers,
>> so it doesn't have any of the insane "for end users" stuff which
>> annoys so many people around here ;-) (On the other hand it does
>> have some web stuff for generating reports, etc).
>
> Kill me now if I have to use GNATS :) Have you ever tried submitting
> a bug to the FreeBSD project? *shudder*
>
> That said, I'll live :)
>
> I have recently totally falling in love with Trac and its complete
> subversion integration. I'm not sure it supports PostgreSQL, and
> converting to subversion is probably a little too hardcore at the
> moment :)

Trac does support PostgreSQL...

The thing I don't understand at this point is what exactly is the
nature of the integration with the SCM.

I don't see it being likely that there will be a deep integration of
the PostgreSQL SCM (whatever the SCM platform) with Trac; that's way
too much change to expect quickly...
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "ofni.secnanifxunil" "@" "enworbbc"))
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/spreadsheets.html
Any programmer who fails to comply with the standard naming,
formatting, or commenting conventions should be shot. If it so
happens that it is inconvenient to shoot him, then he is to be
politely requested to recode his program in adherence to the above
standard. -- Michael Spier, Digital Equipment Corporation