From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "JS Ubei" <jsubei(at)yahoo(dot)fr> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: optimize query with a maximum(date) extraction |
Date: | 2007-09-05 11:30:21 |
Message-ID: | 87abs1qrhu.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
"JS Ubei" <jsubei(at)yahoo(dot)fr> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I need to improve a query like :
>
> SELECT id, min(the_date), max(the_date) FROM my_table GROUP BY id;
>
> Stupidly, I create a B-tree index on my_table(the_date), witch is logically
> not used in my query, because it's not with a constant ? isn't it ?
That's not so stupid, it would be possible for a database to make use of such
an index for this query. But it's not one of the plans Postgres knows how to
execute.
I don't think you'll find anything much faster for this particular query. You
could profile running these two (non-standard) queries:
SELECT DISTINCT ON (id) id, the_date AS min_date FROM my_table ORDER BY id, the_date ASC
SELECT DISTINCT ON (id) id, the_date AS max_date FROM my_table ORDER BY id, the_date DESC
I think the first of these can actually use your index but the latter can't
unless you create one for it specifically (which is not so easy -- it'll be
easier in 8.3 though). Worse, I'm not really sure it'll be any faster than the
query you already have.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-09-05 12:06:01 | Re: optimize query with a maximum(date) extraction |
Previous Message | Gregory Williamson | 2007-09-05 11:06:43 | FW: optimize query with a maximum(date) extraction |