From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Rick Schumeyer <rschumeyer(at)ieee(dot)org>, "'PgSql General'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql |
Date: | 2005-03-16 14:30:30 |
Message-ID: | 878y4noe7t.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Also, a 32-bit machine can only hold so much RAM. If I'm correct, there
>> are ways to address more memory than that on a 32 bit machine, but I
>> wonder at what cost? In other words, is it a good idea to address more
>> than 4GB on a 32 bit machine? If not, is it a reasonable choice to
>> invest in 64 bit if you want >4GB of RAM? Or are you better off just
>> spending the money on RAID and staying at 4GB?
>
> It entirely depends on the database but not that the 32bit limit of 4GB
> is per CPU. So if you have 4 CPUs you can have 16GB of ram.
It's actually per-process, not per-CPU. The x86 ISA only has 32-bit
address registers, so a process can only "see" 4GB max. The PAE
extensions that came in with the PPro allow for more address bits in
the page tables, so each process sees a different subset of a larger
pool of physical RAM.
The implication of this for PostgreSQL on x86 is that each backend has
a maximum of 4GB (actually, usually more like 3 to allow for kernel
address space) that must include shared buffers, server code and data,
and memory used for sorting etc.
On 64-bit platforms, the 4GB address space limitation disappears, and
a single backend could use 20GB for a sort, if the memory was
available and the administrator allowed it.
> However, you should be running Opterons anyway.
Yup. :)
-Doug
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Miroslav Šulc | 2005-03-16 14:34:47 | psql file restore - problem with encoding |
Previous Message | Jason Tesser | 2005-03-16 14:18:22 | Re: 2 questions about types |