From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Version 8.1 |
Date: | 2006-02-17 05:56:54 |
Message-ID: | 878xsav87t.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
The world rejoiced as joe(dot)saloom(at)ngc(dot)com ("Saloom, Joe \(Space Technology\)") wrote:
> Is this database just standalone or can it be embedded. All the
> info that you can find concerning this would be greatly appreciated.
If, by "embedded," you mean that the database would run inside some
existing process, the answer is a clear "no, not gonna do that."
If you *truly* need an "embedded" database, you should probably look
into SQLite.
It would be possible to mostly hide a PostgreSQL instance, via:
- creating some local directory inside your application filesystem
where it would hide
- don't turn on TCP/IP; only use Unix Domain Sockets to communicate
with the instance
- make sure the UDS is created somewhere "hidden" in the application
filesystem so it isn't readily visible to users on the system
That would still consist of multiple processes independent of the
application...
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="cbbrowne.com" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/slony.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #218. "I will not pick up a glowing ancient
artifact and shout "Its power is now mine!!!" Instead I will grab some
tongs, transfer it to a hazardous materials container, and transport
it back to my lab for study." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Arnaud Lesauvage | 2006-02-17 09:38:39 | Index usage btree+gist ? |
Previous Message | Sean Davis | 2006-02-17 01:47:16 | Re: Queries to Export |