Re: why it doesn't work? referential integrity

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why it doesn't work? referential integrity
Date: 2007-08-11 12:47:05
Message-ID: 878x8i2q7q.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

> checked_by INT REFERENCES users (id) ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE SET NULL,

> CONTEXT: SQL statement "UPDATE ONLY "public"."tasks" SET "worker" =
> NULL WHERE $1 OPERATOR(pg_catalog.=) "worker""

This says you mistyped the constraint above to refer to tasks(worker) instead
of users(id). Did you?

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Janning Vygen 2007-08-11 13:00:17 Re: why it doesn't work? referential integrity
Previous Message Lew 2007-08-11 12:35:40 Re: Bytea question with \208