From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Craig Ringer" <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Chris Kratz" <chris(dot)kratz(at)vistashare(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Incorrect estimates on correlated filters |
Date: | 2008-08-14 10:12:00 |
Message-ID: | 878wuzvrbj.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
"Craig Ringer" <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> It strikes me that there are really two types of query hint possible here.
>
> One tells the planner (eg) "prefer a merge join here".
>
> The other gives the planner more information that it might not otherwise
> have to work with, so it can improve its decisions. "The values used in
> this join condition are highly correlated".
This sounds familiar:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.general/55730/match=hints
Plus ça change...
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2008-08-14 14:10:24 | Re: Filesystem benchmarking for pg 8.3.3 server |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-08-14 09:51:01 | Re: [HACKERS] autovacuum: use case for indenpedent TOAST table autovac settings |