Re: general questions on Postgresql and deployment on

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: Calvin Wood <calvin(dot)wood(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: general questions on Postgresql and deployment on
Date: 2004-12-03 16:07:28
Message-ID: 877jnzcqm7.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Calvin Wood <calvin(dot)wood(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

> symbolic link. But on win32, there is no equivalent. However, even under
> *nix system, I believe symbolic link can only be created for directories on
> the same hard drive. This seems less than optimal. Typically, one would
> place database files on RAID 5 drives (to maximize random access speed) and
> log files on mirrored drives (to maximize sequential access speed).

On Unix, a symbolic link can point anywhere. It's hard links that are
limited to the same filesystem (not necessarily a disk drive in the
hardware sense).

-Doug

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-12-03 16:09:07 Re: reclaiming diskspace bloat w/near-zero downtime
Previous Message Ed L. 2004-12-03 16:05:02 Re: reclaiming diskspace bloat w/near-zero downtime