| From: | Jorge Godoy <jgodoy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Angva" <angvaw(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: sequence skips 30 values, how? |
| Date: | 2007-02-01 13:34:03 |
| Message-ID: | 877iv2ngs4.fsf@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Angva" <angvaw(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> As others have said, sequences can have gaps. In fact, the thought of
> a gap-free sequence is scary to me. Unless you do very few inserts,
> "gap-free sequence" is pretty much synonymous with "not scalable". If
> your goal is to generate a unique number for each row (which is
> usually the case), then gaps should be fine.
>
> Though I must admit I have occasionally wished for sequences with a
> GAPFREE option...For small, static look-up tables that I update once
> in a blue moon. It's just easier on the eyes to have 1,2,3,4,5 than 1,
> 25, 2405, 95720, 59028598253.
There's a recipe for gapless sequences on Varlena (if you can access it from
your end...) that was the result of discussions here. There's a performance
hit, of course, but it works.
--
Jorge Godoy <jgodoy(at)gmail(dot)com>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2007-02-01 14:19:57 | Re: How can I list the function. |
| Previous Message | Alban Hertroys | 2007-02-01 12:41:08 | Re: PG Email Client |