Re: Getting to beta1

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Getting to beta1
Date: 2010-03-16 09:02:07
Message-ID: 877hpcmygg.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Yes, and on pgsql-docs rather than on this mailing list.
>
> Or ... J.F.D.I (Just F---- Do It). That is, if someone contributed a
> whole buncha new text to the tutorial on pgsql-docs, I can't imagine it
> being rejected out of hand.

That was the bulk of the question, thanks for such a clear answer. I'll
see about giving some time to that, out of the critical path to beta.

> For my part, I plan to just write the tutorial in whatever tool makes it
> easiest to write (likely Lyx, but maybe OOo). Then people can discuss
> what portions belong in the docs, or not.

Should I follow you on that choice or just send a doc patch with poor
SGML markup?
--
dim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-03-16 09:11:56 Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery
Previous Message Domenico Rotiroti 2010-03-16 08:37:42 [RFC] Comments on PostPic project - Repost