| From: | Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke(at)gnu(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Roel Janssen <roel(at)gnu(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber(at)dustycloud(dot)org>, guix-devel(at)gnu(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgres 9.6.2 update breakage |
| Date: | 2017-05-14 10:49:09 |
| Message-ID: | 877f1j90ii.fsf@gnu.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Roel Janssen writes:
> So, it would be something like:
> postgres pg_upgrade \
> ...
It's great to have a recipe `that works', so thanks!
However, whether or not we automate this, I cannot help to wonder if
we should support downgrading -- at least to the previous version
in this case?
If I'm not mistaken, everything else in GuixSD will run if I select a
previous system generation in Grub...except for this?
Is involving postgres developers an option, I'm sure a least one of
the postgresql hackers[cc] are already looking at Guix[SD]?
Greetings,
janneke
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke(at)gnu(dot)org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ildus Kurbangaliev | 2017-05-14 12:05:25 | Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues for foreign tables |
| Previous Message | amul sul | 2017-05-14 08:00:24 | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |