| From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions |
| Date: | 2018-06-12 14:05:16 |
| Message-ID: | 877en4t82y.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
>> The real question is why check_function_bodies doesn't cover this;
>> there's a comment in fmgr_c_validator that this is deliberate, but it's
>> rather unclear what the advantage is supposed to be:
Tom> Error detection, ie did you spell the C symbol name correctly.
Right, but surely restoring a dump is not the place to be doing that
error check?
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski | 2018-06-12 14:20:59 | Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions |
| Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2018-06-12 14:03:32 | Re: assert in nested SQL procedure call in current HEAD |