Re: Minor bug in src/port/rint.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark(dot)cave-ayland(at)ilande(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Minor bug in src/port/rint.c
Date: 2008-03-25 05:20:37
Message-ID: 8774.1206422437@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Added to TODO:
> o Fix port/rint.c to be spec-compliant

Actually, the TODO I had in mind was entirely not that. Getting exact
spec compliance in a completely platform-independent fashion is probably
impossible, and is certainly not worth the trouble in view of the fact
that every SUS-compliant platform provides a working rint() already.
The proper wording of this item is

* Find a correct rint() substitute on Windows

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mx 2008-03-25 07:39:11 Re: [GSoC] (Is it OK to choose items without % mark in theToDoList) && (is it an acceptable idea to build index on Flash Disk)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-25 05:13:42 Re: [GSoC] (Is it OK to choose items without % mark in theToDoList) && (is it an acceptable idea to build index on Flash Disk)