From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca> |
Cc: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: sslinfo extension - add notbefore and notafter timestamps |
Date: | 2024-03-20 14:03:45 |
Message-ID: | 8770B249-4164-44B3-8D04-5576FEB4196F@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 20 Mar 2024, at 00:24, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca> wrote:
> but it seems to me that many of the timestamp related functions still consider
> timestamp or timestampTz as "double values with units of seconds" though.
The issue here is that postgres use a different epoch from the unix epoch, so
any dates calcuated based on the unix epoch need to be adjusted. I've hacked
this up in the attached v11 using overflow-safe integer mul/add as proposed by
Jacob upthread (we really shouldn't risk overflowing an int64 here but there is
no harm in using belts and suspenders here as a defensive measure).
The attached v11 is what I propose we go ahead with unless there further
comments on this.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v11-0001-Add-notBefore-and-notAfter-to-SSL-cert-info-disp.patch | application/octet-stream | 29.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-03-20 14:08:39 | Re: Improve readability by using designated initializers when possible |
Previous Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2024-03-20 14:00:00 | Re: Test 031_recovery_conflict.pl is not immune to autovacuum |