| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client |
| Date: | 2006-05-23 15:26:44 |
| Message-ID: | 8768.1148398004@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> My recent patch will prevent server startup, so if you do a fast restart
> to bounce the server and change parameters you'll have to keep the
> server down while the archiver completes (or you kill it).
BTW, I was not planning on having it do that. The archiver subprocess
should fail to start (and the PM keep trying to start it). Not take
down the entire database.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mario Splivalo | 2006-05-23 15:47:31 | Getting UPDATEs/INSERTs/DELETEs from transaction log? |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-05-23 15:17:12 | Re: [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-05-23 15:26:58 | Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition |
| Previous Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2006-05-23 15:23:16 | file-locking and postmaster.pid |