From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Henrik Steffen" <steffen(at)city-map(dot)de> |
Cc: | <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Upgrade to dual processor machine? |
Date: | 2002-11-14 21:28:29 |
Message-ID: | 8765uzsuwy.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
"Henrik Steffen" <steffen(at)city-map(dot)de> writes:
> I have many UPDATEs and INSERTs on my log-statistics. For each
> http-request there will be an INSERT into the logfile. And if
> certain customer pages are downloaded there will even be an UPDATE
> in a customer-statistics table causing a hits column to be set to
> hits+1... I didn't think this was a dramatical change so far.
Just to clarify, INSERT does not create dead rows -- tables that have
lots of INSERTS don't need to be vacuumed particularly often. In
contrast, an UPDATE is really a DELETE plus an INSERT, so it *will*
create dead rows.
To get an idea of how many dead tuples there are in a table, try
contrib/pgstattuple (maybe it's only in 7.3's contrib/, not sure).
> Still sure to run VACUUM ANALYZE on these tables so often?
Well, the ANALYZE part is probably rarely needed, as I wouldn't think
the statistical distribution of the data in the table changes very
frequently -- so maybe run a database-wide ANALYZE once per day? But
if a table is updated frequently, VACUUM frequently is definately a
good idea.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-11-14 21:34:18 | Re: postmaster, but not pg_ctl -i -i |
Previous Message | jmelesky | 2002-11-14 21:26:05 | Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2002-11-14 21:29:12 | Re: swapping? |
Previous Message | jmelesky | 2002-11-14 21:26:05 | Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine? |