Re: feature proposal ...

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, tshipley(at)deru(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: feature proposal ...
Date: 2005-09-22 13:15:23
Message-ID: 8764stmefo.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> So we could refute this argument by just not making the permission check for
> CREATE TEMP VIEW.

This is the first time I've ever heard of CREATE TEMP VIEW. What's the point
of it since you can always directly do:

SELECT * FROM (...)

?

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-09-22 14:36:41 Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages?
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2005-09-22 12:58:57 Re: Parser bug results in ambiguous errors/behaviour