From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Brendan Duddridge <brendan(at)clickspace(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: App very unresponsive while performing simple update |
Date: | 2006-05-28 23:24:14 |
Message-ID: | 8764jpn36p.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>
> > Except I don't think this is taking an exclusive lock at all. The original
> > post had the deadlock detection fire on a SharedLock.
>
> Yeah, but it was a ShareLock on a transaction ID, which is the trace
> of something doing XactLockTableWait, which is only done if we're
> blocking on a locked or updated-but-uncommitted row.
Oops, didn't see this before I sent my last message. Brendan, in case it's not
clear, in case of a conflict between my explanation and Tom's listen to Tom.
:)
--
greg
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anton Maksimenkov | 2006-05-29 09:53:24 | select with "like" from another table |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2006-05-28 23:20:59 | Re: App very unresponsive while performing simple update |