| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Prepared statements considered harmful |
| Date: | 2006-08-31 16:10:35 |
| Message-ID: | 8764.1157040635@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> As noted downthread, we've confused out-of-line parameter value shipping
>> with prepared statements. It might be worth rejiggering the FE/BE
>> protocol to separate those things better.
> Well, that's surely not going to happen in a hurry, is it? Maybe a quick
> fix would be a way to allow the user to turn plan caching on and off.
There aren't any "quick fixes" here (at least nothing that's likely to
appear in 8.2). But I didn't mean the above suggestion as our only
response to Peter's criticism --- more that that is one of several areas
we ought to think about.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-08-31 16:11:52 | Thought provoking piece on NetBSD |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-31 16:04:51 | Re: Prepared statements considered harmful |