Re: BUG #12819: CREATE TYPE fails within CREATE SCHEMA

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

Tom> Currently, only CREATE TABLE, CREATE VIEW, CREATE INDEX, CREATE
Tom> SEQUENCE, CREATE TRIGGER and GRANT are accepted as clauses within
Tom> CREATE SCHEMA.

Tom> That's basically driven by what was required in SQL92. It's
Tom> unlikely that we're going to worry about extending that set much,
Tom> because the lack of separating semicolons means that we risk
Tom> syntax ambiguities anytime we add more options.

CREATE and GRANT are both fully reserved already; what potential
ambiguities are introduced by adding more CREATE statement variants to
that list? (all the spec's clauses for the body of CREATE SCHEMA begin
with either CREATE or GRANT)

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)