From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: v12 and pg_restore -f- |
Date: | 2019-10-06 21:02:49 |
Message-ID: | 875zl11tla.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
Tom> Perhaps we could change the back branches so that they interpret
Tom> "-f -" as "write to stdout", but without enforcing that you use
Tom> that syntax.
We should definitely do that.
Tom> Alternatively, we could revert the v12 behavior change. On the
Tom> whole that might be the wiser course. I do not think the costs and
Tom> benefits of this change were all that carefully thought through.
Failing to specify -d is a _really fricking common_ mistake for
inexperienced users, who may not realize that the fact that they're
seeing a ton of SQL on their terminal is not the normal result.
Seriously, this comes up on a regular basis on IRC (which is why I
suggested initially that we should do something about it).
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-10-06 21:15:24 | Re: v12 and pg_restore -f- |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-10-06 20:43:13 | Re: v12 and pg_restore -f- |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-10-06 21:15:24 | Re: v12 and pg_restore -f- |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-10-06 20:43:13 | Re: v12 and pg_restore -f- |