| From: | Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com" <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers |
| Date: | 2024-02-15 08:53:30 |
| Message-ID: | 875xyqhzs6.fsf@163.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:04:30AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
>
> My main worry here is EXEC_BACKEND, where we would just use our own
> implementation of fork(), and it is a bad idea at the end to leave
> that untouched while we could have code paths that attempt to access
> it. At the end, I have moved the initialization at the same place as
> where we set MyProcPort for a backend in BackendInitialize(), mainly
> as a matter of consistency because ClientConnectionInfo is aimed at
> being a subset of that. And applied.
I found a compiler complaint of this patch. The attached fix that.
--
Best Regards
Andy Fan
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-Remove-the-parameter-maxsize-set-but-not-used-err.patch | text/x-diff | 990 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jian he | 2024-02-15 09:09:20 | Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations |
| Previous Message | Andy Fan | 2024-02-15 08:38:03 | Re: make add_paths_to_append_rel aware of startup cost |