Re: Why is parula failing?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, tharar(at)amazon(dot)com
Subject: Re: Why is parula failing?
Date: 2024-05-13 23:29:18
Message-ID: 875482.1715642958@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I've not seen any recent failures from Parula that relate to this
> issue. The last one seems to have been about 4 weeks ago.

> I'm now wondering if it's time to revert the debugging code added in
> 1db689715. Does anyone think differently?

+1. It seems like we wrote off the other issue as a compiler bug,
so I don't have much trouble assuming that this one was too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Jungwirth 2024-05-13 23:30:37 Re: SQL:2011 application time
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2024-05-13 23:28:03 Re: Adding the extension name to EData / log_line_prefix