From: | "Stephen Conley" <cheetah(at)tanabi(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Uwe Bartels" <uwe(dot)bartels(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: requested shared memory size overflows size_t |
Date: | 2008-07-15 21:26:52 |
Message-ID: | 8752fe670807151426s3cab7a9dt49b8e180295bbda3@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hey there;
As Tom notes before maybe you're not using the right postgres. Solaris 10
comes with a postgres, but on SPARC it's 32 bit compiled (I can't speak to
x86 Solaris though).
Assuming that's not the problem, you can be 100% sure if your Postgres
binary is actually 64 bit by using the file command on the 'postgres'
executable. A sample from 64 bit SPARC looks like this:
postgres: ELF 64-bit MSB executable SPARCV9 Version 1, UltraSPARC3
Extensions Required, dynamically linked, not stripped
But x86 should show something similar. I have run Postgres up to about 8
gigs of RAM on Solaris without trouble. Anyway, sorry if this is obvious /
not helpful but good luck :)
Steve
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Uwe Bartels" <uwe(dot)bartels(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > When trying to to set shared_buffers greater then 3,5 GB on 32 GB x86
> > machine with solaris 10 I running in this error:
> > FATAL: requested shared memory size overflows size_t
>
> > The solaris x86 ist 64-bit and the compiled postgres is as well 64-bit.
>
> Either it's not really a 64-bit build, or you made an error in your
> math. What did you try to set shared_buffers to, exactly? Did you
> increase any other parameters at the same time?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Patrick Vachon | 2008-07-16 21:37:58 | Difference between 8.1 & 8.3 |
Previous Message | Jeffrey Baker | 2008-07-15 15:54:00 | Re: 3ware vs Areca |