| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql/src/test/regress (GNUmakefile pg_regress.sh) |
| Date: | 2000-11-22 00:49:22 |
| Message-ID: | 8750.974854162@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> What if the compiler (native) is xlc (AIX?) ?
At the moment, we only know of a need to distinguish gcc from
vendor-supplied compilers, so I think Peter's solution of "gcc" or "cc"
is OK until proven inadequate. It's going to be fairly difficult to
come up with a portable method of identifying compilers more closely
than that, anyway. Looking at the pathname would be easily fooled,
and moreover not necessarily good enough: HP ships two considerably
different compilers for HPUX, but calls 'em both cc :-(
Let's try this for now, and worry about better ideas when and if we
need one.
(Eventually I think we're going to have to tweak the geometry tests
to round off the last couple digits, which should eliminate most
of the problem anyway...)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | tgl | 2000-11-22 00:58:47 | pgsql/doc/src/sgml (regress.sgml) |
| Previous Message | petere | 2000-11-22 00:24:28 | pgsql (configure configure.in) |